I want to mention the concept of walkabout and then go for a meander with the ohmaps idea. The idea is to eventually look at if the ohmap extends from resistance (DC behaviour circuits) to impedence (AC circuits) in any useful way.

I introduced ohmaps in parts 1 and 2 and looked at some simpler examples.

We looked at parallel and series resistor networks (and combinations of those):

And I wrote this:

And not every resistor network can be shown as an ohmap – things outwith simple series/parallel nestings, like delta or Y networks.

It turns out I was a little hasty here. So how might ohmaps cope with more interesting networks?

More on Ohmaps: component failure battles, limitations, ambiguity…

Disclaimer: I am not an electrician. Nothing here is electrical advice/expertise. Insure your garments.

Occasionally there’s a lovely moment when I’m working on a problem and I realise I’m also looking at some other thing that seems completely unrelated. It’s like a metaphor made flesh.

These ‘ isomorphism moments’ can be powerful because the two seemingly unrelated things can give you insights into each other. Their commonality encourages you think about the essential thread running through them both.

This post details one of these moments I had recently.